(a) Every disability insurer that covers hospital, medical, or surgical benefits shall provide an external, independent review process to examine the insurer’s coverage decisions regarding experimental or investigational therapies for individual insureds who meet all of the following criteria:
(1) (A)The insured has a life-threatening or seriously debilitating condition.
(B) For purposes of this section, “life-threatening” means either or both of the following:
(i) Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is
(ii) Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(C) For purposes of this section, “seriously debilitating” means diseases or conditions that cause major irreversible morbidity.
(2) The insured’s physician certifies that the insured has a condition, as defined in paragraph (1), for which standard therapies have not been effective in improving the condition of the insured, for which standard therapies would not be medically appropriate for the insured, or for which there is no more beneficial standard therapy covered by the insurer than the therapy proposed pursuant to paragraph (3).
(3) Either (A) the insured’s contracting physician has recommended a drug, device,
procedure, or other therapy that the physician certifies in writing is likely to be more beneficial to the insured than any available standard therapies, or (B) the insured, or the insured’s physician who is a licensed, board-certified or board-eligible physician qualified to practice in the area of practice appropriate to treat the insured’s condition, has requested a therapy that, based on two documents from the medical and scientific evidence, as defined in subdivision (d), is likely to be more beneficial for the insured than any available standard therapy. The physician certification pursuant to this subdivision shall include a statement of the evidence relied upon by the physician in certifying his or her recommendation. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to require the insurer to pay for the services of a noncontracting physician, provided pursuant to this subdivision, that are not otherwise covered pursuant to the contract.
(4) The insured has been denied coverage by the insurer for a drug, device, procedure, or other therapy recommended or requested pursuant to paragraph (3), unless coverage for the specific therapy has been excluded by the insurer’s contract.
(5) The specific drug, device, procedure, or other therapy recommended pursuant to paragraph (3) would be a covered service except for the insurer’s determination that the therapy is experimental or under investigation.
(b) The insurer’s decision to deny, delay, or modify experimental or investigational therapies shall be subject to the independent medical review process established under Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 2, except that in lieu of the information specified in subdivision (b) of Section 10169.3, an independent medical reviewer shall base his or her determination on
relevant medical and scientific evidence, including, but not limited to, the medical and scientific evidence defined in subdivision (d).
(c) The independent medical review process shall also meet the following criteria:
(1) The insurer shall notify eligible insureds in writing of the opportunity to request the external independent review within five business days of the decision to deny coverage.
(2) If the insured’s physician determines that the proposed therapy would be significantly less effective if not promptly initiated, the analyses and recommendations of the experts on the panel shall be rendered within seven days of the request for expedited review. At the request of the expert, the deadline shall be extended by up to three days for a delay in providing the documents required. The timeframes specified in
this paragraph shall be in addition to any otherwise applicable timeframes contained in subdivision (c) of Section 10169.3.
(3) Each expert’s analysis and recommendation shall be in written form and state the reasons the requested therapy is or is not likely to be more beneficial for the insured than any available standard therapy, and the reasons that the expert recommends that the therapy should or should not be covered by the insurer, citing the insured’s specific medical condition, the relevant documents, and the relevant medical and scientific evidence, including, but not limited to, the medical and scientific evidence as defined in subdivision (d), to support the expert’s recommendation.
(4) Coverage for the services required under this section shall be provided subject to the terms and conditions generally applicable to other benefits under the contract.
(d) For the purposes of subdivision (b), “medical and scientific evidence” means the following sources:
(1) Peer-reviewed scientific studies published in or accepted for publication by medical journals that meet nationally recognized requirements for scientific manuscripts and that submit most of their published articles for review by experts who are not part of the editorial staff.
(2) Peer-reviewed literature, biomedical compendia and other medical literature that meet the criteria of the National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine for indexing in Index Medicus, Excerpta Medicus (EMBASE), Medline and MEDLARS database of Health Services Technology Assessment Research (HSTAR).
(3) Medical journals recognized by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, under Section 1861(t)(2) of the Social Security Act.
(4) Either of the following reference compendia:
(A) The American Hospital Formulary Service’s Drug Information.
(B) The American Dental Association Accepted Dental Therapeutics.
(5) Any of the following reference compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(A) The Elsevier Gold Standard’s Clinical Pharmacology.
(B) The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(C) The Thomson
(6) Findings, studies, or research conducted by or under the auspices of federal government agencies and nationally recognized federal research institutes, including the Federal Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Academy of Sciences, Health Care Financing Administration, Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, and any national board recognized by the National Institutes of Health for the purpose of evaluating the medical value of health services.
(7) Peer-reviewed abstracts accepted for presentation at major medical association meetings.
(e) The independent review process established by this section shall be required on and after January 1, 2001.