(a)
The commission shall adopt annually, following noticed public hearings, a proposed budget by May 1 and final budget by June 15. At a minimum, the proposed and final budget shall be equal to the budget adopted for the previous fiscal year unless the commission finds that reduced staffing or program costs will nevertheless allow the commission to fulfill the purposes and programs of this chapter. The commission shall transmit its proposed and final budgets to the board of supervisors, to each city, and to each independent special district.
(b)
After public hearings, consideration of comments, and adoption of a final budget by the commission pursuant to subdivision (a), the auditor
shall apportion the net operating expenses of a commission in the following manner:
(1)
(A)In counties in which there is city and independent special district representation on the commission, the county, cities, and independent special districts shall each provide a one-third share of the commission’s operational costs.
(B)
The cities’ share shall be apportioned in proportion to each city’s total revenues, as reported in the most recent edition of the Cities Annual Report published by the Controller, as a percentage of the combined city revenues within a county, or by an alternative method approved by a majority of cities representing the majority of the combined cities’ populations.
(C)
The independent special districts’ share shall be apportioned in proportion to each district’s total
revenues as a percentage of the combined total district revenues within a county. Except as provided in subparagraph (D), an independent special district’s total revenue shall be calculated for nonenterprise activities as total revenues for general purpose transactions less intergovernmental revenue and for enterprise activities as total operating and nonoperating revenues less intergovernmental revenue, as reported in the most recent edition of the “Special Districts Annual Report” published by the Controller, or by an alternative method approved by a majority of the agencies, representing a majority of their combined populations. For the purposes of fulfilling the requirement of this section, a multicounty independent special district shall be required to pay its apportionment in its principal county. It is the intent of the Legislature that no single district or class or type of district shall bear a disproportionate amount of the district share of costs.
(D)
(i)For purposes of apportioning costs to a health care district formed pursuant to Division 23 (commencing with Section 32000) of the Health and Safety Code that operates a hospital, a health care district’s share, except as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), shall be apportioned in proportion to each district’s net from operations as reported in the most recent edition of the hospital financial disclosure report form published by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, as a percentage of the combined independent special districts’ net operating revenues within a county.
(ii)
A health care district for which net from operations is a negative number may not be apportioned any share of the commission’s operational costs until the fiscal year following positive net from operations, as reported in the most recent edition of the hospital financial
disclosure report form published by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
(iii)A health care district that has filed and is operating under public entity bankruptcy pursuant to federal bankruptcy law, shall not be apportioned any share of the commission’s operational costs until the fiscal year following its discharge from bankruptcy.
(iv)
As used in this subparagraph “net from operations” means total operating revenue less total operating expenses.
(E)
Notwithstanding the requirements of subparagraph (C), the independent special districts’ share may be apportioned by an alternative method approved by a majority of the districts, representing a majority of the combined populations. However, in no event shall an individual district’s apportionment exceed the amount that would be calculated pursuant
to subparagraphs (C) and (D), or in excess of 50 percent of the total independent special districts’ share, without the consent of that district.
(F)
Notwithstanding the requirements of subparagraph (C), no independent special district shall be apportioned a share of more than 50 percent of the total independent special districts’ share of the commission’s operational costs, without the consent of the district as otherwise provided in this section. In those counties in which a district’s share is limited to 50 percent of the total independent special districts’ share of the commission’s operational costs, the share of the remaining districts shall be increased on a proportional basis so that the total amount for all districts equals the share apportioned by the auditor to independent special districts.
(2)
In counties in which there is no independent special district
representation on the commission, the county and its cities shall each provide a one-half share of the commission’s operational costs. The cities’ share shall be apportioned in the manner described in paragraph (1).
(3)
In counties in which there are no cities, the county and its special districts shall each provide a one-half share of the commission’s operational costs. The independent special districts’ share shall be apportioned in the manner described for cities’ apportionment in paragraph (1). If there is no independent special district representation on the commission, the county shall pay all of the commission’s operational costs.
(4)
Instead of determining apportionment pursuant to paragraph (1), (2), or (3), any alternative method of apportionment of the net operating expenses of the commission may be used if approved by a majority vote of each of the following: the board
of supervisors; a majority of the cities representing a majority of the total population of cities in the county; and the independent special districts representing a majority of the combined total population of independent special districts in the county. However, in no event shall an individual district’s apportionment exceed the amount that would be calculated pursuant to subparagraphs (C) and (D) of paragraph (1), or in excess of 50 percent of the total independent special districts’ share, without the consent of that district.
(c)
After apportioning the costs as required in subdivision (b), the auditor shall request payment from the board of supervisors and from each city and each independent special district no later than July 1 of each year for the amount that entity owes and the actual administrative costs incurred by the auditor in apportioning costs and requesting payment from each entity. If the county, a city, or an independent
special district does not remit its required payment within 60 days, the commission may determine an appropriate method of collecting the required payment, including a request to the auditor to collect an equivalent amount from the property tax, or any fee or eligible revenue owed to the county, city, or district. The auditor shall provide written notice to the county, city, or district prior to appropriating a share of the property tax or other revenue to the commission for the payment due the commission pursuant to this section. Any expenses incurred by the commission or the auditor in collecting late payments or successfully challenging nonpayment shall be added to the payment owed to the commission. Between the beginning of the fiscal year and the time the auditor receives payment from each affected city and district, the board of supervisors shall transmit funds to the commission sufficient to cover the first two months of the commission’s operating expenses as specified by the commission. When the city
and district payments are received by the commission, the county’s portion of the commission’s annual operating expenses shall be credited with funds already received from the county. If, at the end of the fiscal year, the commission has funds in excess of what it needs, the commission may retain those funds and calculate them into the following fiscal year’s budget. If, during the fiscal year, the commission is without adequate funds to operate, the board of supervisors may loan the commission funds. The commission shall appropriate sufficient funds in its budget for the subsequent fiscal year to repay the loan.